What does it take for states to expand access to substance use disorder treatment and build stronger, more sustainable partnerships between Medicaid and public health?  In Massachusetts, leaders changed policies around provider models to increase access to care for opioid use disorder: Frances McGaffey, Manager of Substance Use Prevention and Treatment Initiative at The Pew Charitable Trusts, explains how pairing providers with dedicated nursing support has helped remove barriers to prescribing buprenorphine, expand the addiction workforce, and dramatically increase access to care. She also shares why the state’s decision to extend this model to alcohol and stimulant use disorders is a critical response to a changing overdose crisis, and what other states can do to replicate this success.  Then, Corey Caldwell, Senior Policy Analyst at the National Association of Medicaid Directors discusses the new Medicaid Leaders Playbook for Building Public Health Partnerships, developed in collaboration with ASTHO. Corey outlines practical, real-world steps Medicaid and public health agencies can take to align priorities, address funding and workforce challenges, launch small but impactful pilot projects, and build trust across systems.Understanding Current U.S. Measles Outbreaks and Elimination Status | ASTHO

ASTHO logo

1
00:00:00,920 --> 00:00:03,640
This is Public Health Review
Morning Edition for Thursday,

2
00:00:03,640 --> 00:00:07,080
January 29th, 2026.
I'm John Sheehan for the

3
00:00:07,080 --> 00:00:09,880
Association of State and
Territorial Health Officials.

4
00:00:10,440 --> 00:00:13,640
Today, how Massachusetts is
expanding access to substance

5
00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:16,480
use disorder treatment and
building stronger, more

6
00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:19,560
sustainable partnerships between
Medicaid and public health.

7
00:00:20,120 --> 00:00:21,760
Our guest.
Is Frances Mcgaffey.

8
00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:24,240
Manager of substance use
prevention and treatment

9
00:00:24,240 --> 00:00:26,400
initiative at The Pew Charitable
Trusts.

10
00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:30,000
She'll explain how policies and
practices that incentivize

11
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:33,440
Office Based Addiction
treatment, or OBAT, like

12
00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:36,240
Massachusetts shift to pairing
providers with dedicated nursing

13
00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:39,240
support, have helped remove
barriers to prescribing

14
00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:42,360
buprenorphine, expanded the
addiction workforce, and

15
00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:44,480
dramatically increased access to
care.

16
00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:48,840
Later on, Corey Caldwell, senior
policy analyst at the National

17
00:00:48,840 --> 00:00:52,400
Association of Medicaid
Directors, we'll discuss the new

18
00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:55,240
Medicaid Leaders Playbook for
Building Public Health

19
00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:58,080
Partnerships, which was
developed in collaboration with

20
00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:00,760
ASTO.
He'll outline practical, real

21
00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:03,840
world steps Medicaid and public
health agencies can take to

22
00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:06,800
align priorities, address
funding and workforce

23
00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:10,600
challenges, and launch small but
impactful pilot projects.

24
00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:13,720
But first, here's Frances
Mcgaffey explaining how

25
00:01:13,720 --> 00:01:17,120
Massachusetts initiated new
incentives to integrate opioid

26
00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:20,760
use disorder treatment with
primary care using the Nurse

27
00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:25,320
Care Manager model.
The Nurse Care Manager Model for

28
00:01:25,600 --> 00:01:29,320
OUD treatment or opioid use
Disorder treatment enables

29
00:01:29,320 --> 00:01:33,000
providers like doctors and nurse
practitioners to serve more

30
00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:37,440
patients by giving them the
resources of a dedicated nursing

31
00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:41,640
staff who can monitor patients
and coordinate their care while

32
00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:45,320
they're receiving buprenorphine.
And the state's been very

33
00:01:45,320 --> 00:01:51,400
successful just by one metric.
In 2023, 79% of Massachusetts

34
00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:55,640
Medicaid enrollees with OUD
received medication, which is

35
00:01:55,720 --> 00:01:59,480
higher than the national median.
Why do you think that this model

36
00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:02,280
is so successful?
So the model addresses a lot of

37
00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:05,560
the barriers to prescribing
buprenorphine that providers

38
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:07,200
have been talking about for a
long time.

39
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:12,240
The lack of time to address
complex needs, the lack of

40
00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:15,800
nursing support and care
coordination to help patients

41
00:02:15,800 --> 00:02:19,560
with opioid use disorder stay
retained in care and achieve

42
00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:23,680
their goals.
So by giving that support in

43
00:02:23,680 --> 00:02:26,840
Massachusetts, they went from
just a handful of providers

44
00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:30,720
offering this care to now over
40 providers over the state.

45
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:34,280
The increase in access made it
possible for more people to get

46
00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:38,880
the care that they need.
And what other kinds of care of

47
00:02:38,880 --> 00:02:41,920
treatments?
What else is being rolled into

48
00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:44,000
this model?
Yes.

49
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:48,000
So the model originally started
to treat people with opioid use

50
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:52,720
disorder and in 2022 eligibility
was expanded to people with

51
00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:54,920
alcohol and simulant use
disorders.

52
00:02:55,600 --> 00:02:59,120
Alcohol use disorder can also be
treated with medication in a

53
00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:02,000
primary care setting, and
there's even some off label

54
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:05,080
medications that can be used for
simulant use disorder.

55
00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:09,400
So by allowing people with these
conditions to get the care that

56
00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:13,760
they need, Massachusetts is able
to address the changing needs of

57
00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:17,080
the overdose crisis.
And I know other states are

58
00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:19,920
already sort of looking to
Massachusetts as first in class

59
00:03:19,920 --> 00:03:24,360
in this this kind of care.
What can other states do that

60
00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:28,520
want to replicate your success?
The biggest take away from what

61
00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:33,400
Massachusetts did is that they
drew on a workforce that already

62
00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:35,640
opted into providing addiction
care.

63
00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:39,600
If you think 20 years ago in
Massachusetts and in other

64
00:03:39,600 --> 00:03:43,360
states, primary care providers
didn't really see a role for

65
00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:46,720
themselves in treating substance
use disorders.

66
00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:50,120
But now through the nurse care
manager model in Massachusetts,

67
00:03:50,120 --> 00:03:53,840
a lot of providers already said,
I get it, there is something I

68
00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:55,840
can do about opioid use
disorder.

69
00:03:56,200 --> 00:04:00,000
And so in Massachusetts said you
can also provide these services

70
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:02,520
to people with alcohol and
stimulant use disorders.

71
00:04:03,080 --> 00:04:05,680
They stepped up to the plate.
As long as they have the

72
00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:08,640
training and support that they
needed, they were willing to do

73
00:04:08,640 --> 00:04:11,160
that.
And other states that have also

74
00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:14,720
developed an addiction workforce
through their efforts to

75
00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:17,680
increase buprenorphine can do
that same thing.

76
00:04:18,560 --> 00:04:21,440
So it sounds like.
Sort of an expansion of

77
00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:24,840
Workforce.
Definitions of how primary care

78
00:04:24,840 --> 00:04:28,880
providers think of themselves
now sort of taking this, this

79
00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:33,520
extra level of care and
treatment that wasn't once part

80
00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:36,760
of their world and taking it on.
That's right.

81
00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:39,920
And what we have seen is that in
Massachusetts and across the

82
00:04:39,920 --> 00:04:43,280
country, a lot of primary care
providers have now recognized

83
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:46,880
that they cancer people with
opioid use disorder.

84
00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:50,440
And as long as they have the
training and technical

85
00:04:50,440 --> 00:04:53,480
assistance, you know, the
education they maybe didn't get

86
00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:57,840
in Med school, they'll take on
other SU DS as well, as long as

87
00:04:57,840 --> 00:05:01,680
it's also paired with
reimbursement that pays for them

88
00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:04,840
to deliver those services.
And you touched on this a bit,

89
00:05:04,840 --> 00:05:09,080
but do you have advice for other
policy makers who are looking to

90
00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:12,560
to start this in their state?
The first thing is to start with

91
00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:15,760
what you have.
There is other ways of providing

92
00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:20,400
office based opioid treatment
and those services can be

93
00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:24,480
leveraged to treat other SU DS
and in states that haven't

94
00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:27,640
really incentivized that
approach they should start.

95
00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:32,560
We know that if you provide
adequate reimbursement and

96
00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:35,640
training and technical
assistance, you can really

97
00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:38,800
expand your addiction workforce
and get more people the care

98
00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:41,400
that they need.
So again, it's really about

99
00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:45,360
making it a priority and
expanding definitions of what of

100
00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:47,880
where that treatment.
Can happen and building skills

101
00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:50,320
for this workforce.
That's right.

102
00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:54,760
So many times people think that
addiction medicine, addiction

103
00:05:54,760 --> 00:05:59,760
treatment only happens in a 30
or 90 day residential setting.

104
00:06:00,280 --> 00:06:02,680
And of course that's an
important part of the treatment

105
00:06:02,680 --> 00:06:06,120
ecosystem, but it's not the only
way to deliver care.

106
00:06:06,480 --> 00:06:09,520
And so we need to have other
options that maybe fit into

107
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:12,960
people's lives better or provide
that continuing care after they

108
00:06:12,960 --> 00:06:16,280
leave those settings.
And Francis, so do you have any

109
00:06:16,280 --> 00:06:18,520
final thoughts in this program?
It's been so successful.

110
00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:23,000
What this program shows is the
need to think bigger than opioid

111
00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:28,600
use disorder.
So much of our policy, state and

112
00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:32,080
federal, has been focused on
opioid use disorder and

113
00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:37,160
appropriately, because we had
and still are in an opioid

114
00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:40,040
overdose crisis.
But that crisis is changing.

115
00:06:40,800 --> 00:06:45,120
More overdose deaths involve
stimulants than ever before, and

116
00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:48,920
alcohol is a leading driver of
substance use related deaths.

117
00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:53,080
So states like Massachusetts are
showing that it's possible to

118
00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:55,880
address these other SU DS and
really meet the needs of

119
00:06:55,880 --> 00:06:59,040
residents.
Francis McAfee.

120
00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:01,360
Is manager of substance use
prevention and treatment

121
00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:03,720
initiative at The Pew Charitable
Trusts.

122
00:07:04,440 --> 00:07:07,560
Now let's hear from Corey
Caldwell, senior policy analyst

123
00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:10,000
at the National Association of
Medicaid Directors.

124
00:07:10,480 --> 00:07:13,360
I asked him about the new
Medicaid Leaders Playbook for

125
00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:15,840
Building Public Health
Partnerships, which was

126
00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:17,760
developed in collaboration with
ASTO.

127
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:22,040
At its core, the Playbook is
really designed to be practical

128
00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:24,400
and hands on.
It's draws directly from the

129
00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:27,040
experiences of leaders in both
the Medicaid and public health

130
00:07:27,040 --> 00:07:29,800
space with a focus on what
actually works in States.

131
00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:33,840
And the goal really was designed
to give Medicaid readers clear

132
00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:36,520
and actionable strategies for
collaborating with public health

133
00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:40,080
partners, not just in theory and
in kind of complex guides, but

134
00:07:40,080 --> 00:07:43,160
in day-to-day practice and
operation and operations.

135
00:07:43,160 --> 00:07:45,560
And the playbook walks through
concrete steps for learning

136
00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:47,520
priorities, navigating
structural and cultural

137
00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:50,840
differences between agencies and
really is designed to support

138
00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:53,440
and improve kind of work between
the two agencies.

139
00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:56,240
And it really does provide kind
of a road map to support that

140
00:07:56,240 --> 00:07:58,800
higher level collaboration that
I know in AMD and Aslow has been

141
00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:03,680
working together on.
And so Medicaid and public

142
00:08:03,680 --> 00:08:05,640
health are are different
systems.

143
00:08:05,640 --> 00:08:08,360
They share goals, but they're
very different.

144
00:08:09,800 --> 00:08:12,720
What are some steps that
agencies can take to sort of

145
00:08:12,720 --> 00:08:16,120
build those partnerships?
Well, that's a, a really great

146
00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:18,240
question.
And I, I will note that it's

147
00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:21,120
something here in AMD we've been
thinking a lot about over the

148
00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:24,040
past year.
And one key theme that came

149
00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:27,040
through as we were developing
this playbook is that the best

150
00:08:27,040 --> 00:08:29,600
place to start is often with
relationships built on

151
00:08:29,600 --> 00:08:31,640
understanding.
So it sounds very, very simple,

152
00:08:31,640 --> 00:08:35,200
but even though Medicaid and
public health serve a lot of the

153
00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:38,400
same populations, they often
work under different mandates,

154
00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:40,240
funding structures, and even
timelines.

155
00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:42,480
And because of this,
collaboration doesn't always

156
00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:45,120
happen automatically.
For for Medicaid leaders, it

157
00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:47,200
starts with getting a clear
picture of statewide public

158
00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:49,840
health priorities.
So thinking through things like

159
00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:52,720
maternal health, chronic disease
prevention, or even behavioral

160
00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:54,920
health initiatives, and then
finding those areas where

161
00:08:54,920 --> 00:08:56,520
Medicaid and public health
overlap.

162
00:08:56,880 --> 00:08:59,240
And from there, it's all about
starting conversations with

163
00:08:59,240 --> 00:09:02,360
shared goals and in mind.
And the playbook really doesn't

164
00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:04,280
urge leaders to take it step by
step.

165
00:09:04,280 --> 00:09:07,000
It's about starting small and
being very intentional.

166
00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:10,640
Picking one or two common issues
or populations to focus on can

167
00:09:10,640 --> 00:09:13,040
really help build that trust
between the two agencies to

168
00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:15,520
achieve some pilot projects or
even joint planning.

169
00:09:15,520 --> 00:09:19,080
And even simple steps like
attending each other's meetings,

170
00:09:19,120 --> 00:09:21,600
sharing program updates or
lining around existing

171
00:09:21,600 --> 00:09:23,640
initiatives and go a long way
and creating a strong

172
00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:25,480
foundation.
And really the key here is just

173
00:09:25,480 --> 00:09:28,240
transparency, mutual benefit,
and so the breeding, those early

174
00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:30,760
wins that build confidence for
bigger collaboration down the

175
00:09:30,760 --> 00:09:36,000
road.
And since certainly Kovid, but

176
00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:40,360
also in recent years, the public
health system has faced a lot of

177
00:09:40,680 --> 00:09:43,880
funding uncertainties.
No surprises there.

178
00:09:45,240 --> 00:09:48,760
What can what can Medicaid do to
sort of help shore up those

179
00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:51,080
funding gaps?
Well, that's a really important

180
00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:54,880
question, especially right now.
In historically, Medicaid and

181
00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:57,800
public health have played
different but very complementary

182
00:09:57,800 --> 00:10:00,600
roles with each other.
Public health funding is often

183
00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:03,440
grant based, which makes it
great for piloting new ideas and

184
00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:06,240
testing what works.
Medicaid, by contrast, is

185
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:08,280
jointly funded by the state
governments and the federal

186
00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:11,400
government, so it's in a much
better position to scale things

187
00:10:11,400 --> 00:10:14,000
up and keep them going.
Overtime, especially in public

188
00:10:14,000 --> 00:10:15,640
health funding, can be
unpredictable.

189
00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:20,120
At the same time, I I think it's
very important to be realistic

190
00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:21,520
about what states are dealing
with.

191
00:10:21,680 --> 00:10:24,560
Both Medicaid agencies and
public health departments are

192
00:10:24,560 --> 00:10:27,600
under real budget pressure right
now with slowing state revenues

193
00:10:27,600 --> 00:10:29,800
and the end of COVAD era
emergency funding.

194
00:10:30,640 --> 00:10:34,120
Medicaid also has very specific
federal rules about what it can

195
00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:36,120
pay for.
Its dollars have to be tied to

196
00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:39,600
define services and eligible
populations, so it's not able to

197
00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:41,960
fully replace broad public
health funding.

198
00:10:42,080 --> 00:10:45,160
But with that, with that being
said and within those limits,

199
00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:47,840
Medicaid can still play a
meaningful role.

200
00:10:48,040 --> 00:10:50,800
One key opportunity is
reimbursing for services that

201
00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:53,680
public health departments or
agencies are already delivering.

202
00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:56,160
Think about things like
community based supports or

203
00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:59,480
preventative services.
Moving those activities from

204
00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:02,960
short term grants into Medicaid
reimbursement can make that that

205
00:11:02,960 --> 00:11:05,080
work more stable and even more
sustainable.

206
00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:08,960
Medicaid can can also support
public health and less direct

207
00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:12,760
but still important ways.
An example can include states

208
00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:15,640
better aligning Medicaid
incentives and quality measures

209
00:11:15,640 --> 00:11:18,600
of public health goals.
They can also invest in shared

210
00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:21,560
data systems that support both
program oversight and public

211
00:11:21,560 --> 00:11:23,800
health monitoring.
So I think just that the main

212
00:11:23,800 --> 00:11:26,800
point to your question here is
while Medicaid can't fill every

213
00:11:26,800 --> 00:11:29,960
gap left by the end of the
COVID-19 emergency funding, it

214
00:11:29,960 --> 00:11:32,800
can help sustain critical
services, reinforce core

215
00:11:32,800 --> 00:11:35,040
infrastructure, and make sure
public health efforts continue

216
00:11:35,040 --> 00:11:37,480
to reach the people who depend
most on both systems.

217
00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:41,360
Along those lines, another
challenge facing the public

218
00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:44,680
health system is is workforce
shortages.

219
00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:47,960
Are there opportunities there
for Medicaid to help with

220
00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:51,840
workforce?
Certainly, and this is a really

221
00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:53,640
important issue for states right
now.

222
00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:57,600
Workforce shortages are one of
the biggest challenges facing

223
00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:00,000
both Medicaid and public health,
and you can really see the

224
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:03,400
effects almost everywhere.
Providers are stretched, then

225
00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:05,720
public health teams are
understaffed and communities can

226
00:12:05,720 --> 00:12:08,360
often struggle to get the care
and the services that they need.

227
00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:12,000
And one of the the big takeaways
from the playbook is that states

228
00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:14,760
can make real progress when when
Medicaid and public health are

229
00:12:14,760 --> 00:12:17,120
intentional about working
together and really play to

230
00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:20,360
their respective state,
respective strengths across

231
00:12:20,360 --> 00:12:22,040
states.
We've seen some promising

232
00:12:22,040 --> 00:12:26,120
approaches emerge and one that
comes up a lot is expanding the

233
00:12:26,120 --> 00:12:28,000
use of non traditional provider
roles.

234
00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:30,200
So think through things like
community health workers,

235
00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:32,520
doulas, or peer support
specialists.

236
00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:35,760
And public health agencies are
often well positioned to handle

237
00:12:35,760 --> 00:12:38,000
things like training and
community outreach for these

238
00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:39,680
roles.
While Medicaid can help by

239
00:12:39,680 --> 00:12:42,520
creating sustainable
reimbursement pathways, when

240
00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:45,120
those pieces are aligned, states
can start building long term

241
00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:48,840
workforce pipelines rather than
relying on short term grants or

242
00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:51,760
short term funding.
Data sharing also plays an

243
00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:54,800
important role.
Public health contributes

244
00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:58,120
population level data and
Medicaid brings claims and

245
00:12:58,120 --> 00:13:00,760
utilization information.
And when states bring those data

246
00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:03,280
sources together, they get a
much clearer picture of where

247
00:13:03,280 --> 00:13:06,440
workforce shortages are most
acute and where investments or

248
00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:08,560
new care models can have the
greatest impact.

249
00:13:09,720 --> 00:13:12,160
Lastly, we're we're also seeing
states coordinate more closely

250
00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:15,360
on recruitment and training
through shared internships,

251
00:13:15,360 --> 00:13:18,200
community based pipelines or
partnerships with local

252
00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,120
colleges.
And these efforts are especially

253
00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:23,040
important for rural and
underserved committees that

254
00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:25,920
often faced face the toughest
staffing challenges.

255
00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:30,400
Another point in the playbook,
and something you've mentioned a

256
00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:35,040
couple Times Now, are how states
could utilize small pilot

257
00:13:35,040 --> 00:13:38,040
projects.
Could you give us some examples

258
00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:40,240
of what that means?
Absolutely.

259
00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:43,360
One of the things that Playbook
really emphasizes is starting

260
00:13:43,360 --> 00:13:45,720
small.
Those focused pilot projects are

261
00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:48,560
often the most effective way for
Medicaid and public health to

262
00:13:48,560 --> 00:13:51,960
begin working together.
They give both sides room to

263
00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:54,960
test ideas, build trust, and
work through differences in

264
00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:58,280
things like funding timelines or
even data systems without the

265
00:13:58,280 --> 00:14:00,840
pressure of having to launch a
huge kind of statewide

266
00:14:00,840 --> 00:14:02,960
initiative out of the gate or
right away.

267
00:14:03,600 --> 00:14:06,480
We've seen some really strong
examples of this in practice,

268
00:14:06,480 --> 00:14:09,360
especially around the kind of
programmatic areas of maternal

269
00:14:09,360 --> 00:14:10,960
health and managed care
procurement.

270
00:14:11,480 --> 00:14:14,760
On the maternal health side,
public health agencies often

271
00:14:14,760 --> 00:14:17,440
already have deep connections in
the community through programs

272
00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:20,000
like home visiting programs or
partnerships with local

273
00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:23,000
providers.
Successful pilots build on that

274
00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:25,400
foundation, with Medicaid
stepping in to support

275
00:14:25,400 --> 00:14:28,400
reimbursement and align managed
care expectations so pregnant

276
00:14:28,400 --> 00:14:30,480
women get consistent outreach
and support.

277
00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:34,400
Even fairly modest pilots
focused on higher risk

278
00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:37,800
pregnancies have led to better
engagement, stronger health

279
00:14:37,800 --> 00:14:40,000
education and smoother care
coordination.

280
00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:42,760
It's a great example of how
Medicaid's financing and

281
00:14:42,760 --> 00:14:44,800
clinical structure can
complement public health's

282
00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:47,680
community reach.
Another area where pilots have

283
00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:49,400
made a real difference is
managed care.

284
00:14:49,840 --> 00:14:53,120
In these cases, states test test
ways to better align

285
00:14:53,120 --> 00:14:55,720
preventative health priorities
and managed care contracts with

286
00:14:55,720 --> 00:14:57,480
input from their public health
colleagues.

287
00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:00,840
That alignment helps ensure
managed care organizations are

288
00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:03,400
focusing on prevention and
population health in ways that

289
00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:05,120
support broader public health
goals.

290
00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:08,800
Even small efforts here can lead
to noticeable improvements in

291
00:15:08,800 --> 00:15:11,200
preventative service delivery
and stronger connections between

292
00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:12,880
clinical care and in public
health.

293
00:15:14,440 --> 00:15:21,240
And finally, Corey, what would
one step be that an agency or an

294
00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:24,520
official could could take to
sort of strengthen their

295
00:15:24,520 --> 00:15:27,400
relationship with with their
Medicaid colleagues?

296
00:15:27,840 --> 00:15:30,600
One of the most effective things
public health leaders can do

297
00:15:30,600 --> 00:15:32,680
right now is actually very, very
simple.

298
00:15:32,680 --> 00:15:34,720
It's just starting the
conversation.

299
00:15:34,840 --> 00:15:37,200
Reaching out to Medicaid
leadership to set up a short and

300
00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:40,240
trajectory meeting can go a long
way in laying the groundwork for

301
00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:42,640
trust, which our playbook really
highlights as essential for

302
00:15:42,640 --> 00:15:46,200
those long term partnerships.
In that first conversation, it

303
00:15:46,200 --> 00:15:49,960
can help to have a very clear
and focused dialogue so public

304
00:15:49,960 --> 00:15:53,080
health leaders can share things
like high level snapshots of

305
00:15:53,080 --> 00:15:55,600
their current priorities,
especially ones that have

306
00:15:55,600 --> 00:15:57,800
natural overlap with Medicaid
goals.

307
00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:00,840
I want to notice well that
Medicaid leaders are often

308
00:16:00,840 --> 00:16:04,280
managing a lot of regulatory and
operational complexity and they

309
00:16:04,280 --> 00:16:07,080
may not always have full
visibility into the programs,

310
00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:09,960
partnerships, or even data that
public health agencies can bring

311
00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:12,720
to the table.
So even a quick overview can

312
00:16:12,720 --> 00:16:14,760
surface opportunities that
neither side had really

313
00:16:14,760 --> 00:16:17,800
considered before.
It's also useful to come in with

314
00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:20,720
a few concrete examples of our
alignment already exists.

315
00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:23,280
So pointing out areas where
public health work is supporting

316
00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:25,720
Medicaid populations, whether
that's their community based

317
00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:28,480
supports, maternal and child
health efforts or population

318
00:16:28,480 --> 00:16:31,400
level data help us both sides
see where collaboration could

319
00:16:31,400 --> 00:16:34,400
realistically start.
And the big take away that I

320
00:16:34,400 --> 00:16:37,240
think both public health leaders
and Medicaid leaders should kind

321
00:16:37,240 --> 00:16:40,240
of glean from our playbook as
well as the the podcast today is

322
00:16:40,240 --> 00:16:42,880
that it doesn't have to be
complicated to initiate

323
00:16:42,880 --> 00:16:45,000
partnership or even begin
partnership.

324
00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:48,280
Sometimes a single well time
conversation is enough to spark

325
00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:50,480
interest, build report and
really open the door to things

326
00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:53,120
like small pilot projects or
more regular communication.

327
00:16:53,120 --> 00:16:56,080
It may sound like a modest first
step, but it often turns into

328
00:16:56,080 --> 00:16:58,040
the beginning of a much stronger
and more coordinated

329
00:16:58,040 --> 00:17:00,080
relationship between public
health in Medicaid.

330
00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:04,560
Corey Caldwell is senior policy
analyst at the National

331
00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:06,480
Association of Medicaid
Directors.

332
00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:10,280
Earlier we heard from Francis
Mcgaffey, manager of substance

333
00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:13,160
use prevention and treatment
initiative at the Pew Charitable

334
00:17:13,160 --> 00:17:17,520
Trusts.
Measles was declared eliminated

335
00:17:17,520 --> 00:17:21,000
in the US more than 20 years
ago, but that progress is now at

336
00:17:21,000 --> 00:17:23,160
risk.
After the worst year from

337
00:17:23,160 --> 00:17:26,599
measles cases in decades, public
health officials are reassessing

338
00:17:26,599 --> 00:17:30,520
what elimination really means,
why outbreaks are growing, and

339
00:17:30,520 --> 00:17:33,280
what's at stake if we lose that
status altogether.

340
00:17:33,960 --> 00:17:36,960
With most cases occurring among
unvaccinated communities and

341
00:17:36,960 --> 00:17:40,400
outbreak response costing 10s of
thousands of dollars per case,

342
00:17:40,800 --> 00:17:44,280
the message is clear.
Vaccination, trust and strong

343
00:17:44,280 --> 00:17:47,680
public health systems matter.
Learn what's driving today's

344
00:17:47,680 --> 00:17:50,520
measles outbreaks and what
public health agencies are doing

345
00:17:50,520 --> 00:17:53,000
to stop them.
Find a link in the show notes.

346
00:17:54,160 --> 00:17:56,160
This has been Public Health
Review Morning Edition.

347
00:17:56,360 --> 00:17:58,800
I'm John Sheehan for the
Association of State and

348
00:17:58,800 --> 00:18:00,240
Territorial Health Officials.